over the past few days I've had multiple promoters of "play-to-earn" games tell me that it's okay that play-to-earn games aren't fun because owning your own in-game assets or making money being a digital landlord is more important than enjoying yourself

also that if I don't support the current, un-fun play-to-earn games now, then it'll be my fault that we never eventually get play-to-earn games that don't suck shit


people with web3 brain are completely inscrutable to me. I cannot comprehend deliberately living a life where everything is a monetized side hustle

· · Web · 3 · 9 · 32

the idiots that bought the Jodorowsky Dune book were all self-congratulatory about how they built a distributed community based on their shared appreciation of a piece of pop culture. motherfucker that's called a fandom and it doesn't require burning down a forest to create a digital pog

@jimpjorps It's a fad of fads.

I prefer the 'communistic' web; where ideally, all is given away for free , and taken without a fee.

@neglesaks even barring that I'm fine with paying to cover people's costs to host and provide things, but artificial scarcity and speculation are absolutely anathema to a healthy internet

@jimpjorps I used to think that cartoon villains were ridiculous, because no one would ever act like that.

"Grargh! What is... joy? What is fun? I detest these foolish things! I want riches... I want POWER!"

The day when I realised this is actually how some people see the world was a strange one.

@jimpjorps Even more bizarre is that they imagine other people wanting to work solely to enrich *them*. Like that tone-deaf statement from the Square Enix CEO about people who apparently "play to contribute".

Sign in to participate in the conversation

My personal vanity Mastodon server. Registrations are permanently closed. Please contact me directly with questions, comments or problems.